Asset Maintenance Strategies (Part 08)

Series: Asset Management 101 – The Blueprint.

In Part 07, we built our Data Foundation. We now know what we have, where it is, and what condition it’s in. But having data is like having a map; it only matters if you use it to decide which direction to travel.

In Asset Management, that “direction” is your Maintenance Strategies. It is the plan for how you will fight against entropy and decay to keep your assets alive and performing.


The Maintenance Spectrum

Not every asset needs the same level of care. You wouldn’t service a basic desk lamp with the same intensity as a jet engine. We categorise maintenance into three primary categories:

1. Reactive (Run-to-Fail)

This is the simplest form: “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. 

  • When to use it: For low-criticality assets that are cheap to replace and cause no safety or operational risk when they fail. For Example a lightbulb.
  • The Pitfall: If you use this for high-criticality assets, you end up in “Firefighting Mode”, where emergency repairs can cost 10 times more than planned work.

2. Preventative (Time-Based)

This is the “Old School” professional standard: “Fix it every six months, regardless”.

  • When to use it: When failure patterns are predictable and linked to age or usage. For example, changing the oil in a car every 10,000 miles.
  • The Pitfall: You often end up replacing perfectly good parts, which wastes money and can actually introduce “early mortality” due to new parts failing due to installation errors.

3. Predictive (Condition-Based)

This is the “Gold Standard” of modern Asset Management: “Fix it because the data says it’s about to break”.

  • When to use it: For high-criticality assets where we can monitor health indicators like vibration, heat, or acoustics.
  • The Tool: This relies on the P-F Interval, the window of time between detecting a potential failure and the actual breakdown.

The Secret Weapon: The P-F Interval

To master predictive maintenance, you have to understand the P-F Curve. This is a graph that tracks an asset’s health over time.

  • Point P (Potential Failure): This is the moment a failure starts to happen, but the asset is still working. You can’t see it with the naked eye, but a sensor might pick up a tiny vibration or a slight rise in temperature.
  • Point F (Functional Failure): This is the “bang”. The asset has stopped working and is no longer doing its job.

The P-F Interval is the window of time between these two points. As an Asset Manager, your goal is to make this window as wide as possible by using better technology to detect the “P” earlier.

The “Squeaky Brake” Analogy

Think of the brakes on your car:

  • The P (Potential Failure): You start to hear a very faint, occasional squeak when you slow down. The car still stops perfectly, but the “failure” has begun.
  • The F (Functional Failure): You press the pedal and hear a horrific grinding metal sound,or worse, the car doesn’t stop.

If you have Line of Sight and good Data, you catch the squeak (the P). Replacing the brake pads now is quick and much cheaper. If you wait for the grind (the F), you’ll likely have to replace the discs, the calipers, and potentially the whole car.


Understanding the “Value Hole”

Why do we care so much about moving from Reactive to Predictive? Because of the Value Hole.

When an asset fails unexpectedly, the costs aren’t just the repair bill. They include:

  • Lost Production: The factory is standing still.
  • Secondary Damage: A £50 bearing failure causes a £5,000 motor burnout.
  • Safety Risks: Emergency repairs are often more dangerous for technicians than planned work.

By investing in maintenance before the failure, you stay out of the hole and preserve the asset’s value for longer.


Reliability Centred Maintenance

Many infrastructure sectors focus on Reliability Centred Maintenance (RCM). This is a highly structured process used to determine the minimum amount of maintenance required to keep an asset doing what its users want it to do in its present operating context.

It focuses on doing the right maintenance, not the most maintenance; which, in a world of tightening budgets and Net Zero targets, is paramount as we cannot afford to waste materials or energy on unnecessary interventions. This is a core concept of any Asset Maintenance Strategies developed by an organisation using a RCM approach.


Takeaways

  • Criticality Dictates Strategy: High-risk assets get Predictive care; low-risk assets get Reactive care.
  • The Goal is Reliability: Maintenance is not about “fixing things”; it is about ensuring the asset is available when the organisation needs it.
  • Data is the Fuel: You cannot run a Predictive strategy without the “clean” data we discussed in Part 07.
  • Asset Maintenance Strategies: These are you guiding light when reviewing maintenance performance across your estate.

Next Step: Maintenance costs money. A lot of it. In [Part 09], we look at Whole-Life Costing (WLC). We’ll explore why the purchase price of an asset is only the “tip of the iceberg” and how to calculate the true cost of ownership.

GET UPDATED

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our very latest news.

Leave a Reply

You cannot copy content of this page

Discover more from Asset Narrative

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading